METRO EDITION, Roanoke, VA
HEADLINE: EXCERPTS FROM GRAND JURY REPORT
Previous
~ Headlines ~ Next
Here are excerpts from the special grand jury's report on the Vinton Police
Department, which says that former chief Ricky Foutz and Lt. Bill Brown mishandled
money, guns, drugs and other evidence:
Drugs 'sent to the wind'
"... Brown exercised total control over all drug investigations, drug
evidence and destruction of drugs that were seized. A number of officers
testified that Brown ordered them to place confiscated drugs on his desk
or inside his door if he wasn't present to receive them. This violated proper
police procedure and compromised the integrity of the evidence.
"Many current and former officers testified it was their understanding
that Brown destroyed all the drug evidence. According to Brown's testimony,
drug evidence that was no longer needed for court was 'some flushed, some
burned, some sent to the wind.' Brown testified that he would occasionally
destroy drugs in a 'burn barrel' at his home. There was not a procedure
for destruction of drugs and no witnesses were used to ensure that they were
actually destroyed.
There was no evidence that destruction orders for drugs were ever sought
from the courts by the VPD (Vinton Police Department) during the administration
of Foutz and Brown. The Code of Virginia, 18.2-25.3 requires that a court
order be obtained prior to the destruction of any drugs. Both Brown and
Foutz claimed that they did not know that there was such a law (which has
been in effect since 1973) requiring a court order ... "
Gun seizures 'likely' a violation
"The handling of firearms by the VPD was another cause for concern. Guns
were stored in a most haphazard manner. About 40 guns appeared on top of a
table in the evidence room shortly after the SP (state police) began this
investigation.
The officer in charge of the evidence room was never told how the guns
suddenly appeared or from where they had come ...
"Brown testified that all of the guns that suddenly appeared in the evidence
room had been stored at all times in his locker in the department. If he testified
truthfully concerning this matter, it is yet another example of mismanagement
...
"Firearms and other property were seized by Brown ... without criminal
charges being placed, likely violating the rights of the owners. Brown made
a habit of giving individuals the choice of surrendering their property or
being charged, even in instances where no crime had even been committed."
Officers 'unsuitable and unqualified'
"We find that Foutz and Brown are unsuitable and unqualified to have
the positions of authority and trust that they hold. Neither have the leadership
ability or the management skills required for the positions of Chief and
Assistant Chief of Police for the town of Vinton. Foutz generally stayed
in his office if he was present at the police department. ... His support
of Brown was
blind and misplaced. With rare exceptions, he depended on information provided
by Brown in making decisions about the VPD without attempting to determine
the truth for himself. The numerous complaints made to him about Lt. Brown's
conduct were disregarded or ignored."
REPORT: VINTON'S EX-TOP COPS 'UNSUITABLE AND UNQUALIFIED';
24-PAGE GRAND JURY REPORT RELEASED
BYLINE: KIMBERLY O'BRIEN THE ROANOKE TIMES; STAFF WRITER
ZEKE BARLOW CONTRIBUTED TO THIS REPORT.
Previous
~ Headlines ~ Next
Marijuana burned in barrels and flushed down toilets. Stolen weapons recovered
but not returned to owners.
Bikes for needy children given to the police department's families and
friends.
Slush funds. Unlawful arrests. Intimidation of witnesses.
The list goes on, but that's what a special grand jury investigating
the Vinton Police Department found. The details, made public Friday in a
24-page report, paint a picture of two cops who the jury described as "unsuitable
and unqualified" to have held the positions they did.
The details also, according to the report, back up the decision of Vinton
town officials to force the resignations of Chief Ricky Foutz and Lt. Bill
Brown shortly after the investigation began last fall.
"Neither have the leadership ability or the management skills required
for the positions of chief and assistant chief of police for the town of
Vinton," the jury wrote. "In our opinion, town officials would have been
derelict in their duties had they permitted either Foutz or Brown to remain
at the VPD in any capacity."
Town officials said Friday they were "thankful" and "relieved" that the
report had been made public. Town Attorney Buck Heartwell said the report
should make clear to the public why council had to take the actions it did
in asking for the two officers' resignations.
The special grand jury began meeting in November to investigate allegations
about possible wrongdoing in the police department. After more than three
months, the jury released a report showing evidence of improper handling
of public funds, drugs and weapons.
The jury also pointed to Brown as the source of the department's problems
for ruling by "fear, intimidation and retribution." And while the investigation
centered on Brown, the jury said Foutz, described as an "apathetic chief,"
was also to blame for choosing to blindly ignore complaints.
"It troubles us that the problems were apparent to almost every single
member of the VPD, with the notable exception of the chief," the report
states. "He either willfully chose to ignore these grave problems, or was
so oblivious and incompetent that he was not even aware of them.
"Either alternative justified his departure."
The problems ranged from charging for fingerprint services to maintain
a "personal slush fund" to partially smoked marijuana cigarettes, one with
lipstick on it, found in Brown's desk drawer by State Police investigators.
Brown testified that the joints were either turned in to the police department
or found in an ashtray. He said he kept them so he could demonstrate - by
lighting up in his office - what marijuana smelled like to parents.
According to testimony of current and former officers, Brown exercised
"total control" over all drug investigations, drug evidence and destruction
of drugs that were seized. But his methods, according to the jury, often
violated police procedures.
For example: He told officers to place confiscated drugs on his desk
or inside his door if he wasn't there. He occasionally destroyed drugs in
a "burn barrel" at his home. And there was no evidence that destruction orders
for drugs were ever sought from the courts.
State law requires that a court order be obtained prior to the destruction
of any drugs. Both Brown and Foutz testified, however, that they did not
know there was such a law. It has been in effect since 1973.
But Brown testified that drug evidence no longer needed for court was
"some flushed, some burned, some sent to the wind."
The jury said Brown's involvement with the seized drugs was "very suspicious."
"The manner in which he operated with regard to other people made many
enemies for him and also made it easy for others to suspect him of drug
use and other criminal activity," the report read.
At the same time, the jury said they were giving Brown the benefit of
the doubt "in light of his strenuous denials of wrongdoing."
The jury also found irregularities in the way firearms were handled.
Shortly after the investigation began, about 40 guns appeared on a table
in the evidence room, and no one knew where they came from. Brown later testified
the guns had been stored in his locker at the police department.
When the state police did an inventory, they found 90 weapons that didn't
have any documentation, some of which had been in the room for more than
20 years. Two of the weapons had been reported stolen but never returned
to their owners, and at least four were taken from individuals who were not
charged with crimes.
One weapon, turned in by Foutz when he resigned, was determined to be
stolen about 10 years ago. According to the report, the weapon will be returned
to its owner by the state police.
Both Foutz and Brown admitted that the handling of evidence at the police
department was "a joke," the jury said.
Finally, the jury found mishandling of public funds - including money
from the annual Haunted House and a fund used to help needy families.
One year, a bike-a-thon sponsored by a local radio station and the Marine
Corps donated extra bikes to the Needy Family Fund. There were a number
of bikes left over, but they were given to police department employees and
their friends rather than being kept for the next holiday season, the report
said.
Neil Vener, the special prosecutor assigned to the case, said Monday
he was not pursuing criminal charges. Although there were irregularities
in the handling of drugs, weapons and public funds, none rose to the criminal
level, he said.
Still, the jury said that in some instances, illegal conduct did occur.
But, they wrote, the statute of limitations had passed or the statute violated
did not provide for a penalty.
Supporters of Foutz said during a town meeting Tuesday that the allegations
against the former chief came from a few former disgruntled employees. And
Brown's lawyer said in a statement Friday that the special grand jury was
biased and refused to hear from witnesses on behalf of Foutz and Brown.
But the report cited the testimony of 53 people that included former
and current officers from the Vinton Police Department as well as from residents
and officers from other departments.
According to the jury, Brown's "severe lack of judgement in the conduct
of police activities and his acute lack of management skills have created
a climate of suspicion of criminal, unethical or illegal behavior on his
part. The suspicion is held by the majority of the police officers currently
employed by the VPD and citizens and police officers outside the department."
The jury concluded its report by suggesting that a new chief be hired
from outside the Vinton Police Department, that the town council establish
a more active role of oversight, possibly by designating a committee to
supervise it.
Lisa Foutz, the former chief's wife, said the family was still digesting
the report. She said Foutz would make a comment next week.
Cliff Massengill, a 30-year-old resident who said he is a friend of Foutz's,
said he is disappointed with what he read and had a hard time understanding
it. Like many of the 15 or so residents who showed up to look at the report,
Massengill looked dejected after finishing.
"I have mixed emotions," he said. "I didn't understand how these things
could happen."
But like town officials, Massengill said he thinks Vinton would bounce
back from the scandal that has pitted neighbor against neighbor.
"Vinton's a small town and it will recover," he said. "It's got a lot
of good people."
Vinton Police Report
The special grand jury that investigated the Vinton police department
says the former chief and his top lieutenant mishandled money, drugs, guns
and other evidence. Among the highlights, the report found:
Drugs were improperly disposed of without court order. In some cases,
Lt. Bill Brown said he burned drugs at his home, without witnesses. Other
drugs were "sent to the wind."
Among the guns in the department's possession were several that had been
reported stolen by their owners, but whose recovery had never been reported
either to them or to state police.
The officers admitted their handling of evidence was "a joke." Drugs
were sometimes left on Brown's desk or in his office.
The officers gave away bicycles and toys left over from the Christmas
toy giveaway to department employees and friends, rather than hold them
for next season.
The officer charged for fingerprints and put the cash in a "personal
slush fund."
Such poor records were kept on the department's charitable activities
that $3,179 remains unaccounted for, leaving open "the possibility of misuse
of these funds."
Copyright 2000 The , Roanoke Times & World News, Roanoke Times &
World News
Sign
my Guestbook
View
my Guestbook