Roy Willett
This was the trial judge. He ,like most judges, lean to the prosecution
side of the arguments. Willett's irascible manner and always wanting
to know how much time everything is going to take made him some powerful
enemies over the years.
The Bramblett trial was no exception and Willett intimidated Doubles
and Grimes to the point they would acquiesce to all prosecution expert
witnesses as such before any information was given about their qualifications.
Had the prosecution brought in the building maintenance man in a suit
and tie as an expert on anything, Doubles and Grimes would have agreed
on his expertise.
Doubles always did this little Uriah Heep squat when answering
the judge or making a motion. He never stood and looked at the judge directly,
or anyone else for that matter. Doubles, in particular, was terrified
of Willett.
Willett allowed the video tape of the truck in, it was nowhere
near the conditions, time, season and weather conditions of the situations
the old lady saw. Willett allowed the pubic hair in evidence, even thought
neither of the children had ever been molested and the fireman standing on
the bed, the fireman's gloves all over the bed, and the heavy tarp being
thrown over the bed totally compromised any evidence found there. Even with
all this, the pubic hair was determined, it may have been Bramblett's. This
is far from absolutely Bramblett's.
Bramblett asked the Willett to hear the tapes that Keesee had edited
before they were played in court and was turned down. Bramblett asked
Willett to see the pictures the prosecution was going to use in trial
and was turned down. Now, this is Bramblett standing and asking the
judge in court. Not his lawyers. Bramblett also asked if he could ask
the questions of some of the witnesses, but Willett said he would need
to talk to his lawyers. The lawyers weren't about to delay the trial by
asking questions, especially the ones Bramblett wanted asked and answered.
Bramblett tried, and failed, many times during the year he was
in the county jail to fire his lawyers. Willett would not allow this. Bramblett
was asking the lawyers, or the Private Investigator, to contact people
that he wanted to furnish information but the lawyers ran their own
case and investigation (?) as they wished. Doubles opening "argument"
was three (3) minutes long. Doubles "closing" was ten (10) minutes long.
The closing was written at the defense table and Doubles couldn't
read the notes he had just made.
After sitting there listening to all the lies and one
sided evidence that he allowed against Bramblett, this florid, fat faced
boozer had the gall to say, " I hope there's mercy somewhere for you and
all those victims", at which time Bramblett then told Willett, "I'm just
going to say one more time, for the record, I did not kill the Hodges family."
Willett was fired by the General Assembly after being on the bench
for twenty years. As I told you in the beginning, some of the attorneys
that appeared before him went on to be politicians that determined
his career, and I'm sure pay back was sweet.
|
Christian Compton
This is the Senior Virginia Supreme Court Judge. He wrote the majority
opinion on Earl Bramblett's appeal, which is automatic with the death
penalty. There was no minority opinion. There never is, all death
penalty cases in Virginia are upheld. Always have been, and till most
of the people on the court die, always will be. If he read it he either
can't comprehend or he is senile. The information he gave about the case
in deciding his opinion was nothing like the court trial.
Justice Compton went far beyond the court's denying the appeal,
Compton felt the need to praise all the police work and forensics
that had "proven" Bramblett's guilt. What he was praising were lies,
the same bogus evidence I have shown here and proven, without doubt,
they are not the truth. Why would Compton do this? Possibly because he
knows nothing about forensic evidence.
No sooner than this came out, and the newspaper reported Compton's
praise, it was found that the Vinton Police Department was being
investigated by the Grand Jury. The Police Chief, Rick Foutz, quit
abruptly and so did the next in line, Lt. Bill Brown. It had been found
by the Grand Jury that the two had been stealing firearms from the
evidence room, sometimes just took evidence and never charged the person,
stole merchandise and money from charities, and claimed "evidence was
a joke at the Vinton Police Department." They actually said that. This
is the department that investigated Earl Bramblett for murder. This is
the police Compton praised for outstanding police work and forensics.
Grimes was the attorney that argued Bramblett's appeal before the
Virginia Supreme Court. You can imagine what a disaster that was because
Grimes is scared of courts and judges.
|
James C. Turk
This is the Chief Judge for the United States District Court for
the Western District of Virginia. A judge that is all over the board
when it comes to decisions. Thought, at one time, to be Bramblett's
only chance at justice. I heard through the grapevine that his bias
was he thought Bramblett guilty and thought Bramblett had been smart
enough to do the crime without leaving any evidence. I had the mistaken
belief federal judges made decisions on fact.
From his decisions, that must have been the case, because he claimed
the gun evidence being made up wouldn't have had any effect on the
jury, and further claimed that the jail house snitch that testified
against Bramblett and recanted his testimony wouldn't help him either.
Turk chastised one of Bramblett's lawyers for claiming Barry Keesee had
helped Turner's (the jail house snitch) testimony by telling him facts
in the case. Tuck said, "that is a serious charge you are making." Of
course it was a serious charge but Turk didn't take it seriously enough.
Who is he to be telling an attorney what evidence to use? This was a
death penalty case. Everything should have been serious.
I wrote Turk two letters. The first asking him to please reconsider
his decision to turn down Bramblett's request for a new trial. He,
his secretary, wrote back and said he hoped the 4th Circuit would help.
The 4th Circuit had a split decision, two judges against a new trial,
one for a new trial. The last letter to Turk was April 2, 2003 and I
asked he not let these people kill bramblett with their false evidence
and lies. I even included my original FBI-FOIA files and sent it Priority
mail asking for a signature. I see no reason for an answer now.
|